<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wide Spread Exposure &amp; Getting Indexed At Hyperspeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanbluestone.com/wide-spread-exposure-getting-indexed-at-hyperspeed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanbluestone.com/wide-spread-exposure-getting-indexed-at-hyperspeed</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.seanbluestone.com/wide-spread-exposure-getting-indexed-at-hyperspeed/comment-page-1#comment-23519</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanbluestone.com/?p=61#comment-23519</guid>
		<description>Steve, that&#039;s a common misconception which also applies to article submission. If you submit the same article to 20 different article sites then yes, Google, et al, will see this as duplicate content and only show one for each SERP but you aren&#039;t losing out on any SEO advantage by having duplicate content.

The &#039;dreaded&#039; supplimental cache everyone always worries about should not be dreaded at all. It&#039;s job is simply to make sure Google doesn&#039;t list the same results twice per SERP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, that&#8217;s a common misconception which also applies to article submission. If you submit the same article to 20 different article sites then yes, Google, et al, will see this as duplicate content and only show one for each SERP but you aren&#8217;t losing out on any SEO advantage by having duplicate content.</p>
<p>The &#8216;dreaded&#8217; supplimental cache everyone always worries about should not be dreaded at all. It&#8217;s job is simply to make sure Google doesn&#8217;t list the same results twice per SERP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.seanbluestone.com/wide-spread-exposure-getting-indexed-at-hyperspeed/comment-page-1#comment-23179</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanbluestone.com/?p=61#comment-23179</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,
great article thanks, but I am left with one nagging question with regard to this social bookmarking strategy!
If for example I submit my top No.1 article to say 20 SB sites, would not Google and other search engines, see this as duplicated content &amp; as such just either ignore it or relegate it to the dreaded supplimental cache...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,<br />
great article thanks, but I am left with one nagging question with regard to this social bookmarking strategy!<br />
If for example I submit my top No.1 article to say 20 SB sites, would not Google and other search engines, see this as duplicated content &amp; as such just either ignore it or relegate it to the dreaded supplimental cache&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.seanbluestone.com/wide-spread-exposure-getting-indexed-at-hyperspeed/comment-page-1#comment-6098</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanbluestone.com/?p=61#comment-6098</guid>
		<description>Sean, you are very right about this. It is amazing how many websites that I&#039;ve seen and they focus on looking great, but haven&#039;t got good content and internal links for the Google bots to read. Even posting 1 decent article to a SB site, correctly, as you mentioned above, could have you on Google front page for a day ( or more pending your niche). Great article, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, you are very right about this. It is amazing how many websites that I&#8217;ve seen and they focus on looking great, but haven&#8217;t got good content and internal links for the Google bots to read. Even posting 1 decent article to a SB site, correctly, as you mentioned above, could have you on Google front page for a day ( or more pending your niche). Great article, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

